The AI World Order
I stepped into a tripped-out conversation at a yard sale - these two guys talkin’ some deep AI reality sh*t. They were rapid fire throwing out all sorts of facts and figures, most of it I didn’t even know what they were referring to, but I caught enough of it on my memos to reconstruct their points. What they were saying was really fascinating, but what struck me was the young hip are firecracker smart. They are aware and thinking about stuff. Like the older hip, they, too, are looking at reality and questioning what’s really going on. Today’s hip have to be even smarter because the world we live in is moving fast with issues the human race has never dealt with before.
OK, we're talking about neurodivergent people, MPC culture, or people that are not aware, and of the deeper underlying way that AI is manipulating the psychology of humanity.
AI language models, or Large Language Models (LLMs), are artificial intelligence systems designed to understand, process, and generate human-like text. By analyzing massive datasets, it learns language patterns to perform tasks such as answering questions, translating languages, and writing creative content. This LLM is initiating certain responses and creating a norm that is bland, unimaginative, and creating a kind of feedback loop of mimicked interaction.
So, one dude says - Alex Karo, CEO of Palantir, talks about his dyslexia. He explained that his neurodivergence gives him some difficulty in doing things the way other people do them. He had to find a way of getting the job done differently from other people. In doing so, he had to build a toolkit, a novel tool set at a young age. That neuroplasticity and ability to incorporate that extra abstraction layer gave him novel value in the AI world. His non-conformist thinking process allows him to learn and insert non-linear thinking to circumvent the feedback loop of AI production.
Other dude says - They did a study on genius people with super high-level IQ's and found that some of these children were registering with these massive level IQs after running through the education system, but they didn't portray the same level of genius qualities because true genius is adaptability and creativity. It's not the normal metrics that you’d think about. There's logic and human psychology, but we're talking about neuroplasticity, the individual’s ability to create abstractions of the current culture and think of things in a different way, versus where the average person is locked into the simulation.
This lack of neuroplasticity is becoming apparent in the paradox of Christian organized religion that predicts an end state. If your future lacks freedom and can be predicted, then, like any closed state system, you can predict all actions. There is no freedom of choice. If you're truly free, you can't ascribe to any religion that predicts end times or end state to it because the closer you get to the end state, the less free you are to make choices until your choices are narrowed to nothing. I've met evangelical Christians who discussed rebuilding the third temple as something that has to be done to have Jesus’s return. That's the perfect example of how people are being locked into a powerless situation. American politics and the temple community are merging, with their theological views asserting that their end times require this to be done, regardless of political or theological disputes. So again, it's an example of the predictability of human thinking, that our nature becomes predictable due to our faith in the end times, and removes any sort of agency from our choices.
So, as the scope of conformity is enforced, there is a removal of the middle management and arbitration of services into automation. All those jobs disappear. There'll be a narrower and narrower culture of the middle class. In the service class, you're going to see a smaller scope of jobs, as even now we are mostly talking to AI simulations when we call for technical help. And as programming becomes more generated by AI, we will be viewing very little original material from that echo chamber.
The idea that once AI has absorbed all the non-profitable arbitrage and middle management, and removed all the humanistic creating and interaction processes, the only people left as creators will be your skitzo artists and neurodivergent people. So, the neurodivergent person may be the only valuable person in a post-AI content to humanity. They will be the only ones who differ from a normal, predictable person.
In the age where AI can generate music that's almost impossible to distinguish between a human and a non-human, the value of the organic and the imperfections becomes novel. The mistakes and the mess-ups become more interesting because what is valuable to people is to hear something that can feel like it was from a human. We want to hear the mistakes and want to hear the imperfections. It is the Uncanny Valley.
The Uncanny Valley is a Japanese concept of robotics and prosthesis, that when they started to create synthetic life or body parts that are perfectly close in all reasonable ways but lacked the little imperfections of humanity, it's repulsive to humans. We see it as being inorganic and gross. There needs to be the organic elements, or it forces the perceiver to feel the otherness of the thing they interact with, and that's going to be the problem with mankind's interactions with the synthetic world. There's a mass rejection of this AI and the promoters are already aware of it.
See. Scary, right?
The AI investments are a financing bubble for washing the OPEC money through the Saudis back into production. There's a lot going on with the AI bubble. The money games with NVIDIA, which makes the GPUs, and all these data centers, where investors are buying large land chunks that they use only a tiny bit of. There's a lot more investment and valuation than is ever going to be earned on the products because China is really in the lead. The new DeepSeek model from China performs relatively well and ranks in the top three for STEM, while running on fewer resources. Generally, the Chinese have built some pretty good bit compressing, and you're getting more bang for your buck because it’s open source. So, I don't really see us winning any AI arms race on account of there's so much openness in the world market, and America is closed with tariffs.
I think for Investors it’s more about surveillance and not actually content. The last three generations of AI models we’ve been getting haven't really been upgrades. I think they've just been tuning the guardrail layers of the models to sort the people who use it based on different ideas they hold. In fact, I believe they are using AI interaction to elicit responses from the user. AI is used to synthesize human interactions to try to emotionally get you to reveal ideological beliefs, and I believe much of AI is weaponized. They've merged a lot of our content with Palantir. Palantir Technologies is an American software company specializing in big data integration, analytics, and artificial intelligence, founded in 2003 with CIA backing. It processes massive, fragmented datasets to synthesize personality types. Essentially, AI personalities are being used to get through your trust layer. We are complacent in the belief that we have a friend inside this device we're sharing our thoughts with.
The world is in this race for AI. We think China is building it fast, so the U.S. feels we have to speed it up and fast-track the process. But I think that the only possible opportunity we have is to slow down and to develop an aligned AI. An analogy is if everyone is driving fast, heading off a cliff, it doesn't matter if they're driving faster than you are. If we can be the ones driving to an actual destination, even if we’re driving more slowly, we will arrive somewhere intentional. The only possible safety for humanity is to have an aligned AI to defend us from these types of unaligned AI.
So, as Large Language models are able to develop the abilities of the average person, like average art creation, average content, and average responses, the neurodivergent part of humanity will be the only ones of value. The more imaginative and original a person is, the more they can generate organic, novel content or even operate outside the AI matrix. Everyone else will be negligible consumers. The ability to be more abstract and less predictable will be the only human value in an AI-run world.